Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1209

reference
535-tree-1
name
1209
tree-preservation-order

undefined

535-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022984 50.884745)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022927 50.884739,-1.022930 50.884750,-1.022938 50.884760,-1.022950 50.884768,-1.022966 50.884773,-1.022983 50.884775,-1.023001 50.884773,-1.023017 50.884768,-1.023030 50.884761,-1.023038 50.884751,-1.023041 50.884740,-1.023038 50.884728,-1.023030 50.884718,-1.023018 50.884710,-1.023002 50.884705,-1.022985 50.884703,-1.022967 50.884705,-1.022951 50.884710,-1.022938 50.884718,-1.022930 50.884727,-1.022927 50.884739)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL